سڀني وزٽرس کي ڀليڪار چئون ٿا مهرباني ڪري پنهنجا مشوره ۽ شڪايتون اسان جي فيس بڪ پيج تي موڪليندا. FaceBooK

two treasures


      
AS THE Mughal Empire began to go to pieces in the last years of
      Aurangzeb, the Mughal appointees in Sindh also began to disintegrate.
      Their place was promptly taken by the Kalhoras, a native dynasty.


      The Kalhoras were respected Syeds, who claimed to have come from Arabia
      in the days of the Abbaside caliphate. However, nobody is an Immigrant
      after a thousand years. And the fact that their great ancestor was one
      Odhani, only seemed to confirm their native origins.


      Over the centuries, the Kalhoras had added zamindari power to their
      religious position. They had even acquired the zamindari of Gandabah, in
      which capacity they guarded the Bolan and other passes in the Sindh-Baluchistan
      area. With the death of Aurangzeb, wrote Clive, ``Sovereignty had fallen
      to the ground, for anybody to pick it up''. In Sindh it was picked up by
      Mian Yar Mohammed Khan, a scion of the Kalhora family. His armed faqirs,
      Taji and Jada, killed Amir Sheikh Jahan, the Mughal commander, and ousted
      Allahyar Khan, the governor of Bakhar. At first Aurangzeb's son Muizuddin,
      the governor of Lahore, thought of disciplining the Kalhora. But he soon
      realised that discretion would be the better part of valour. He,
      therefore, got the Kalhora appointed governor of Sindh.


      The Kalhoras reunited Sindh, which had earlier been parcelled out among
      the Arghun and Tarkhan chieftains. They also again gave the province a
      local dynasty with its roots in the soil. But they had not been in the
      saddle for long when a typhoon by the name of Nadir Shah hit the province.
        

     

      This Persian adventurer had sacked Delhi in 1739 and the Mughal had
      transferred the sovereignty of the Indian areas beyond Attock, plus Sindh,
      to him. Nadir Shah promptly summoned the Kalhora to his presence in Kabul.
      But the latter neither went himself nor even sent a reply. He thought it
      was best to keep away from a terror such as Nadir Shah. Also he thought
      that Nadir Shah had got too much in his loot of Delhi to bother to mount a
      special campaign to loot poor little Sindh. But Nadir Shah thought
      otherwise. He knew that if one governor got away with defiance, others
      would follow suit. He, therefore, immediately set out for Sindh. The
      frightened Kalhora immediately locked himself up in the fort of Amarkot.
      But Nadir reached there early in 1740 --- even before the Kalhora had had
      time to hide his treasure of one crore rupees. Nadir Shah's very name was
      a terror. When his son Nasir was marrying, he was required by custom to
      name his seven ancestors. People thought that Nadir would be embarrassed
      to name his ancestors who had been nobodies. But Nadir listed
      Nasir-ibn-Nadir-ibn Shamsher-ibn-
      Shamsher-ibn-Shamsher-ibn-Shamsher-ibn-Shamsher-ibn-Sham- sher (i.e. son
      of the sword, for six of the seven times). So Mao's ``thought'' that
      ``power issues from the barrel of a gun'' is not a new one. It is at least
      as old as Nadir.


      This Nadir-ibn-Shamsher point-blank asked the Kalhora why he had run
      away, and the latter candidly replied: ``We had always been loyal servants
      of the emperor of Hindustan. We could not lightly switch loyalties.''
      Nadir liked the reply and confirmed him in his governorship of Sindh. But
      he told him that he had heard that the Kalhora had two most precious
      jewels. The Kalhora confirmed this and produced a sack of wheat flour and
      a tin of ghee! Said the Kalhora: ``These are our jewels. If one has got
      these, one does not need anything else. And if one does not have these,
      nothing else will avail one.''


      Nadir was pleased. He now expressed a desire to see the city of Thatta.
      Here he and his army were lavishly entertained for sixteen days. As he
      left, he took the captured treasure of one crore of rupees and slapped an
      annual tribute of twenty lakh rupees on Sindh. He even carted away the
      Kalhora's library of rare books and manuscripts. He also took with him
      three Kalhora princes and 12,000 Sindhi troops as guarantee for Sindhi
      good conduct. Even so, the people were relieved to see him go. The Kalhora
      princes later described their stay in turbulent Iran as ``hell''.


      Earlier, when Nadir Shah was returning from his loot of Delhi, he was
      taking many Mathura Brahmins captive, to be sold as slaves in Iran. A
      pious Shikarpuri lady, Takht Bai, came to know of it. She requested her
      husband, Seth Kewalram Bhoj- wani, to ransom them all. Instructions were
      accordingly issued to the Seth's business branches all along Nadir's
      route, to have the unfortunate Brahmins freed on payment of Rs. 100-250
      each. The ransomed Brahmins were then given some cash and sent home.
        


      However, one pest followed another. As soon as Nadir the Persian died,
      Ahmed Shah Abdali the Afghan arrived on the scene. Safdarjang in Delhi
      forged a Mughal-Maratha treaty in 1752 --- duly attested by all the Hindu
      deities! --- to face Abdali jointly. This treaty gave the Marathas the
      Chauth rights in the Punjab, Gujerat and Sindh. However, before this
      alliance had time to fructify, the very next year, in 17j3, Abdali invaded
      Sindh to impose Afghan sovereignty on the province. Kalhora Nur Mohammed
      promptly fled to Jaisalmir --- where he died --- leaving it to Dewan
      Gidumal to handle Abdali as best he could.


      Gidumal calmed down Abdali. He presented him with two sackfuls of
      ``holy dust, more precious than any gold or diamonds''. He then persuaded
      Abdali to confirm the Kalhora as governor, on payment of a reduced tribute
      of eleven lakh rupees.


      Once again Sindh heaved a sigh of relief --- only to have yet another
      Afghan, called, of all things, Madad Khan (``Mr. Helpful'') swoop down on
      it. The terrified Sindhi writers of the time noted: ``These Afghans were
      like scorpions and snakes. They were as miserly as they were mean. On the
      poor and helpless, they descended like bijli (lightening); before the
      strong, they ran away like bijli. They would take away even worn-out
      sacks.'' For long the Sindhis described any impending disaster as ``Madad
      Khan is coming''.


      The coming of the Kalhoras' from the north had squeezed the old Hindu
      chiefs in the south. The old Dodo-Chanesar statement, ``Sammas, Sodhas,
      and Soomras, they rule the south of Sindh'', was no longer true. Writes
      Sorley: ``At Umarkot and Kakrola and minor places, Hindu rulers had held
      more or less independent power. The rise of the Serais, the men of the
      upper country, as the Kalhoras and Talpurs were commonly called in lower
      Sindh, changed all this. When they were shut off from Shikarpur, and
      Sukkur, they extended their sway southward and eastward and stamped out
      Hindu independence.'' This led to the Sindh-Kutch wars, in which Sindh,
      being the bigger, had the upper hand. At the end of it, Ghulam Shah
      Kalhoro put up an embankment --- Allah Bund --- to prevent the waters of
      an Indus branch flowing into Kutch. This, however, only reinforced the
      result of an earlier earthquake, which had reduced the water flow in the
      area to a trickle. All this led to an estrangement between Sindh and Kutch.
      The latter now began to consider themselves Gujerati, though they were
      closer to Sindh in every recpect. Sir Charles Napier, the conqueror of
      Sindh, was to note that Sindh and Kutch were united ``in all relations of
      life, civil, religious, commercial and military''.


      The links were particularly close in language. Kutchi is closer to
      Sindhi than to Gujerati. An interesting example of this was witnessed in
      the second Lok Sabha(1957-62).Premjibhai Asser, a Kutchi settled in
      Maharashtra, was elected on the BJS (Bharatiya Jana Sangh) ticket. His
      wife knew neither English nor Hindi nor Marathi. On occasion when
      Premjibhai was not at home, she would answer the callers in Kutchi; Advani,
      being Sindhi, would understand her; he would then translate it in Hindi to
      others! But all these Sindhi-Kutchi links were sundered by the anti- Kutch
      policy of Sindh rulers.


      However, the Kalhoras survived Nadir, Abdali, and the Kutch adventure
      to give Sindh quite a good government. New canals had increased farm
      production. Fish were so abundant that they were dried and then fed to
      horses. Population grew to a record thirty lakhs --- as against twenty
      lakh under their predecessors, the Arghuns, and only fifteen lakh under
      their successors, the Talpurs. Land revenue was reduced from one-third of
      produce under the Mughals, to anything between one-third and one-fifth,
      depending upon the soil and the crop.


      The British East India Company had earlier described Thatta as ``a
      great citie as large as London''. It now had more than 50,000 houses, of
      which many were made of stone and mortar with vast verandahs, sometimes
      three or four storeys high. The textiles of Sindh were ``the flower of the
      whole produce of the East''. The international commerce of Thatta ``gave
      Sindh a place among the nations''. The city had 400 schools and 4000
      boats. The Sindhis sipped the cups that cheered and sweetly inebriated ---
      the wine being made from molasses (gur), grapes (anguri), dates (katta),
      musk (muskhi), sugar candy (misri), roses (gulabi), and saffron (kesari).
      Says Sorley: ``The music of Tanpura and Dholki resounded from every house
      in Thatta.''


      A great gift of the Kalhoras to Sindh was the city of Hyderabad. This
      was the site of the ancient city of Nerunkot (Narainkot). After the Arab
      invasion the city was sacked. It then became a vast graveyard called ``Nerun
      Kafir''. The Muslims considered it specially auspicious to be buried
      there. However, Ghulam Shah Kalhora ordered the graves --- including those
      of -the Princes and the Pirs --- levelled to the ground, setting a healthy
      example for the timid town-planners of today. He then sent Gidumal with
      two boat-loads of money to build the great fort, which the latter
      completed in just two years, 1768-70. It was named ``Hyderabad'' in a bid
      to flatter the Nizam of Hyderabad in Deccan to establish special links
      with him. But the two Hyderabads were too far apart to be of any help to
      each other.


      From the northern gate of the fort was laid out the mile-long Shahi
      Bazaar on the crest of the ridge. The first part was given to the Bhaibund
      businessmen and the latter, to the Hindu Amil civil servants. The only
      exception were the Amil Gidwanis, whose chief, Gidumal, was the top
      minister, and who had to be nearest to the fort. The new capital, with the
      Indus in the west and the Phuleli canal in the east, grew into a great
      garden city.


      Another ancient city which was revived during the Kalhorra rule was
      Shikarpur, which now became the financial capital of not only north-west
      India but also of Central Asia. Some people think that the city was
      founded by Kalhoras' cousins Daudpotas --- and it was named Shikarpur
      because the Talpur Mirs were fond of shikar (hunting). Others do not think
      so. They point out that Shikarpur was admittedly there before the shikar-loving
      Talpurs arrived on the scene; for another, Shikarpur has always been a
      trading centre, and never a hunting lodge. Also, the Muslims named their
      cities as ``Abad'' --- and never ``Nagar'' or ``Pur''. These experts think
      that Shikarpur is really Shakaripur --- the ``town founded by the
      vanquisher of the Shakas'', the Scythians. In this connection they point
      out that ``Quetta'' is known in Persian records as ``Shakari Kot'' ---
      ``the (border) fort built by the vanquisher of the Shakas''. Later, on the
      Indian side, it came to be known simply as ``Kot'' or ``Koita'', which the
      British corrupted into ``Quetta''.


      A significant feature of the Kalhora rule was the coming up of the
      Hindus. After lying low for. centuries, they now staged a come-back with
      their sheer intelligence�, adaptability, integrity and hard work. Apart
      from Gidumal --- and his brother Jaspatrai --- we hear of Gen. Balakram,
      vakils Devdas, Mulraj, Ghanshyam, Topandas, Karan Mal, Gulabrai. Mehta
      Motoomal was barkhurdar, one of the top advisers. And then there was Dewan
      Chellaram Sehwani, the exchequer. In Delhi the Kalhoras had two vakils ---
      Anandram ``Mikhlis'' and Mir Mataro (``Sir Plump''). The very first
      Kalhora chief, Adam Shah, had, in the fifteenth century prepared the
      ground for a fair deal for the Hindus. In 1736 Yar Mohammed Kalhora had
      specially invited Adomal (the ancestor of the Advanis) of Multan to settle
      down in Sindh. Many others followed suit from Kutch, Jaisalmir, and even
      faraway Prayag.


      However, the Kalhora period will be known most for Shah Abdul Latif ---
      even as the Elizabethan period is known more for Shakespeare than for
      empire-builders such as Raleigh and Drake. Shah is not merely the greatest
      Sindhi poet, he belongs to world class. If Sindh had to choose between
      Shah and all the rest of the poets, it would no doubt choose Shah.


      However, all good things must come to an end. And the Kalhora rule
      ended only too soon. The Soomras summoned the Sammas to their aid against
      Alauddin --- only to find themselves worsted by them. The Kalhoras invited
      the Baluchis to fight the Mughals, the Persians, and the Afghans. Before
      long they found the Baluchis too strong for their comfort. Indeed there
      were now more Baluchis in Sindh than in Baluchistan. To this were added
      the suspicions and jealousies of the later Kalhoras. Against the advice of
      Gidumal, they got Baluchi chief Bairam and his son Sobdar murdered.
      Bairam's other son, Mir Bajjar, continued to serve the Kalhoras loyally.
      When the Afghan Izzat Yar Khan descended on Sindh with 30,000 men, Bajjar
      faced him with a Sindhi-Baluchi force of 18,000 --- and worsted him. Said
      the Persian Fatehnama of the time: ``As the Baluchis began to ply their
      swords, the earth became red with the blood of the Afghans. Some of them
      were asking for mercy on bended knees, others were running away bare-head
      and bare-foot.''


      But the Kalhoras began to suspect even a successful loyal commander
      such as Bajjar. They asked for his daughter's hand --- as proof of loyalty
      --- which he refused, on the ground of Baluchi tradition. The Kalhoras
      then asked the king of Jodhpur to have Bajjar murdered --- if he wanted
      Amarkot back. Jodhpur's emissaries met Bajjar on the excuse of conveying a
      very confidential message. Pretending to whisper things into his ears,
      they pounced upon him and killed him. (Hence the Sindhi saying that
      whispers could be dangerous; they cost Mir Bajjar his life!) This was more
      than the Baluchis could take. In the fighting that ensued, the Kalhoras
      were defeated by the Talpur Mirs in the battle of Halani in 1782.


      The Afghans were not sure whom to recognize --- the erstwhile Kalhoras
      or the emerging Talpurs. So they said they would recognize the party that
      deposited six lakh rupees first. The Talpur representatives in Kabul ---
      Gidumal, Jaspatrai and Agha Ibrahim Shah Irani --- promptly raised the
      money from the local traders and won recognition for the Talpur Mirs of
      Baluchistan.


      The Kalhora rule had come to an end after a brief but event- ful eighty
      years.